® 
| At the bottom of the page, there is a link to a print ready version. |
What is it really ? Banned or in the "Sandbox" ? Building Incoming Links |
|
|
Please note: Every link on this page opens in a new window. If your "Pop-up killer" is too efficient it can also stop new windows. When this happens, please press "Ctrl" and click on the link you want. What is it really ?Google worked out the filter in March 2004, but it really started hurting some big websites only in 2005. This site is a good example - in 2004 traffic from Google was increasing, in January 2005 Google traffic dropped to zero. This website "graduated" out of the "Sandbox" only in August (2005), i.e. after 7 months.Matt Cutts and other "Googlers" insist no "sandbox" exists, let's still use the word to describe a "phenomenon". There is a collection of filters that together works as an "age barrier". Mainly it has to do with the age of the site or the domain. Some people call it by a collective name: "Trustrank". Anyway it takes some time to show Google a new website is a serious long time effort from your side and not some "overnight" spam. Whether the sandbox exists or not the effects were still there in 2009. In April Rand Fishkin published a report with a very clear chart over how different factors have changed in Google over time ( 2002-2009 ): Page Rank number and On-Page Keyword Usage has dropped steadily, Anchor Text in External Links has dropped since beginning of 2007. Only Trust / Authority of Domain has risen continuously since 2004. It seems to me ( a gut feeling ) a threshold is somewhere at about 5 years. Domains over 5 years old are really in a stronger position. Of course, a domain that has already existed over 5 years and has been continuously expanding ( slowly ) and continuously been maintained cannot in any way be called spam. And that's what it is all about. Banned or in the "Sandbox" ?So how to know if your site is in the "Sandbox"?: |
![]() Cristina's Website Design and Promotion |
|
|||||
|
Last updated: |
|
since Dec 12, 2005 according to: www.digits.com/ |
|
|